Skip to main content

The sanctity of life and the defense of the abused


By Persis - Posted at Tried With Fire:

(In light of the #MeToo hashtag and October being domestic violence awareness month, this is an update of a post from 2 years ago with a few edits and additions.)

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. Genesis 1:27

If you asked me to define the sanctity of life, here it is:

Since all human beings are made in the image of God, all human beings should receive dignity, respect, and the right to life. This applies to the born and unborn. This applies to male and female. This applies to all people regardless of their race or ethnicity. The sanctity of life is not based on the ability to function independently or even the value with which a person contributes to society at large. The sanctity of life is an issue of personhood because identity is individual and never subsumed by another person regardless of the relationship.

I think this definition covers what most evangelical Christians believe especially when it comes to defending the rights of the unborn. The gruesome videos exposing the horrific practices of Planned Parenthood only emphasize the fact that babies in the womb are not blobs of tissue but human beings with distinct organ systems. Thus the slogan, My body, my choice, breaks down because there are two bodies and two people we are talking about - the mother and the child. Even though the unborn baby is totally dependent upon his mother, this dependence does not cause his personhood to be lost or absorbed into his mother's. He is his own person.

So let's fast forward a few years to toddlerhood. This child is still solely dependent upon his parents for his basic needs. He is learning very rudimentary life skills. He cannot contribute to society. His parents bear legal responsibility for him until he is an adult which is years down the road. He is also under his parents' authority in a biblical sense. Does the sanctity of life apply to a toddler? Is this toddler a person? I can't imagine anyone thinking otherwise.

I am going to advance the clock and be specific about gender in this case - a married woman. In the eyes of civil law, she has the full rights of any citizen. She is a functioning member of society. In a gender conservative household, there is an element of submission to her husband per Eph. 5:24. However its extent runs quite a gamut as the non-egalitarian side of the fence is not uniform in practice. Nonetheless, does the sanctity of life apply to this woman? Is she a person in the most basic sense of the word as are the toddler and unborn infant? As in the previous two cases, I can't imagine anyone thinking otherwise.

Comments

Previously Featured Posts

(The Times Examiner) SC Legislature: Redefining How to Kill Babies

Christiansfor Personhood ( CP )
Columbia, South Carolina
March 25, 2018

The Times Examiner ( Greenville, SC ), March 21, 2018:

INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE VOICE OF THE PALMETTO STATE


General Assembly:Redefining How to Kill Babies

_____________________
_____________________

The Times Examiner, Greenville, SC
INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE VOICE OF THE PALMETTO STATE

‘General Assembly: Redefining How to Kill Babies’ [ three pages ]
March 21, 2018
http://christianlifeandliberty.net/2018-03-24-General-Assembly-Redefining-How-to-Kill-Babies-Times-Examiner-Mar-21-2018.pdf

_______________________
_______________________

Excerpts:

[ SC House Rep. Linda ] Bennett, the bill’s sponsor, was reported in The State saying her bill [ H.3548 ] would not stop physicians from performing the procedure [ dismemberment ]. It would, however, require doctors to kill the fetus before it is removed, she said. [ emphasis, hyperlink to The State added ]

“All this bill does is require them to euthanize the baby before the…

I WAS A DISNEY PRINCESS AND HAD AN ABORTION

By Deanna Falchook - Posted at Medium:

I woke up this morning in the shadows of Cinderella Castle, to a phone call from a friend who knows my story well. She informed me of a recent tweet by Planned Parenthood regarding the need for a Disney Princess who’s had an abortion.

We need a disney princess who’s had an abortion / We need a disney princess who’s pro-choice / We need a disney princess who’s an undocumented immigrant / We need a disney princess who’s actually a union worker / We need a disney princess who’s trans.
In 1981, I worked at Disneyworld as a Singer/Dancer where my voice was used in recordings as Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty for special events and ongoing shows. I performed on average 5 shows a day in front of Cinderella’s castle singing and dancing to “Some Day my Prince Will Come,” and “When You Wish Upon a Star.” At the age of 18, I became pregnant and had an abortion to keep my job as a singing princess. There was no pressure from the company or management to abor…

Personhood Prayer Alert

Personhood Prayer Alert: 

Christians, please pray now for SC Sen Shane Massey and the Republican Senate Caucus to have the WILL to set S217 Personhood Bill for Special Order TODAY Tues March 27 in Senate chamber session which begins @ 2PM 

(Video) Re: S217 Personhood Bill - SC Senate chamber session Thurs March 22:  Republican-majority Senate refused once again to set S217 for Special Order during the nearly daily Motion Period. 

To view video go here:

 South Carolina Legislature Video Archives

https://www.scstatehouse.gov/video/archives.php

Then click on the video near top of the  archived list, entitled: "Thursday, March 22, 2018, 11:00 am, Senate - Senate, 1:56:34"

When the video comes up, point the cursor on the sliding time bar to 1:54:00 near the end of last Thurday's Senate session, and observe the next 30 seconds or so to watch how (business-as-usual) Sen Hugh Leatherman (RINO-Florence) moved for the rest of the Motion Period to be dispensed with, and how the entir…